How
did Africa move from multi-cultural independence to colonialism?
This question isn’t simply answered by the desire to have
more land. The fact is that there were a number of things which
led up to what is now called the “Scramble for Africa”.
One of the things
which led to the idea of colonizing the whole of Africa was the
fact that due to the industrial revolution which occurred in the
19th century, Europe was in need of raw materials. Considering
Africa’s abundance in natural resources, it was natural
for Europe to look south in order to expand its industrial growth.
Additionally, whatever
opposition there might have been to the idea of colonizing Africa
was weakened thanks to scientists such as Charles Darwin who were
writing literature concerning the “savageness” of
the African people; where they were most often compared to lowly-evolved
relatives of the monkey. Once Darwin even said: “At some
future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the
civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and
replace the savage races throughout the world'.
Considering the
number of Darwinists which were describing Africans as peoples
who were simply closer to the monkey than to the human; it is
more understandable that the abuse of Africans, (slavery, colonization,
genocide, etc…), would be accepted more or less. The idea
of “survival of the fittest” was even applied to women.
If we accept the beliefs of the period, only the European male
had managed to become most fully evolved. So his desire to conquer
all “lesser evolved” beings was completely natural.
The colonial period
of Africa also coincides with the Christian missionary expansion.
So it is very clear as to how the European peoples (Christian
for the most-part) were able to move through Africa forcibly taking
lands from Africans, putting them in camps, or simply killing
them to take their resources and power. After all, it simplified
the job of missionaries. Until this period, Christianity was for
the most part isolated in the Horn of Africa (Egypt and Ethiopia
had Christian populations very early on).
In the eyes of
the colonists, Europe was either bringing pagans to Christianity
to save their souls; or they were doing their duty as more highly
evolved humans and continuing to build a stronger civilization.
It boiled down to survival of the fittest or salvation from hedonism.
How did colonialism
come to be in Africa? One major event changed the face of Africa
forever; the Berlin Treaty of 1885.
Although Europeans
had control of some small areas of the African continent; the
vast majority of Africa (80%) was still under local
control at the time that the Berlin Conference was held in 1884.
Before the ambassadors of 14 different European countries sat
around a table and divided Africa into parcels which they would
rule, there were over a thousand different ethnic groups who had
already evolved their own forms of government, culture and structures.
(To learn more about ancient Africa, read Mama’s
article "Ancient Africa")
All of that changed
forever on November 15, 1884 when the Berlin Conference was organized
by German chancellor Otto von Bismarck at the request of the European
nation of Portugal. The conference was intended to settle some
of the questions and disputes over expansion and control of territory
on the African continent by various European powers. In an attempt
to increase their strength and power, European countries were
moving further and further out of their boundaries to conquer
new lands. Africa’s proximity to Europe made it a common-sense
solution to many. Other issues that were addressed at the conference
were: suppressing the internal slave trade and ensuring a European
monopoly of the gun trade by outlawing the importation of firearms into
Africa.
The following
countries met and created a map haphazardly of Africa with absolutely
NO consideration for, or input from, the native peoples they would
force to live the consequences. The countries present were: Austria-Hungry,
Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands,
Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden-Norway (who were unified from
1814 to 1905), Turkey and the United States of America. Since
they already controlled most of the territories which were under
European control, France, Germany, Great Britain and Portugal
had the most power at the conference.
The conference
lasted 3 months, when the Treaty of Berlin was signed. It spelled
out that the Congo River and Niger River would remain neutral
territory and they bickered over which boundaries would be used
to split the continent up into sections which they could divide among
themselves. There was no attention paid to the natural boundaries
formed by language, religion or ethnicity of the African people.
But the Berlin
Conference was certainly not the final word on the shape and fate
of Africa. In the years that followed, (the major European powers
continued to dispute the territories until in 1914), they had
cut Africa up into 50 “states” which they divided
among themselves. Additionally, despite the fact that they had
previously agreed that the Congo River would remain neutral territory;
Belgium’s King Leopold decided to make much of the Congo
River Basin his personal playground. Unfortunately though, while
converting the region into his personal empire, over 50% of the
population died in the region as well! And by 1900, over 90% of
Africa was under colonial control!
Next week,
we’ll be looking more at the different types of colonial
rule as well as the specific effects of colonialism on African
women, in Part Two of this article...
See you
then!